How far will the Democrats go on gay rights?
House likely to pass job protections, but omit transgender people
![]() | Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., is sponsor of a bill to ban employer discrimination against gays and lesbians. |
Mark Wilson / Getty Images file |
Cartoons |
Agnew called Sen. Charles Goodell of New York “the Christine Jorgensen of the Republican Party."
Pundits found Agnew's sneering reference to the well-known 1950s transsexual clever, even if a bit harsh.
Today members of Congress aren’t making such people the butt of jokes; they’re debating whether they should have protection under federal law.
Many Americans know and work with a gay or lesbian person, but how many have a nodding acquaintance with a transgender person?
That distinction may explain why the House of Representatives is likely to vote within the next few weeks for job protections for gays and lesbians, but not for people who are transsexuals or adopt the appearance and mannerisms of the other sex.
The House Democratic leadership is giving activists from gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) groups a few weeks to try to round up the votes to include transgender people in the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA).
The bill would make it illegal for an employer to fire, refuse to hire, or offer less pay to a person “because of such individual's actual or perceived sexual orientation.”
Activists “have two weeks to try to get the votes” to include transgender people in ENDA, said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chief sponsor of the bill.
Defining 'gender identity'
Frank’s original ENDA, introduced last April, also said employers could not discriminate against workers on the basis of "gender identity” which his bill defined as “the gender-related identity, appearance, or mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of an individual, with or without regard to the individual's designated sex at birth.”
|
A House veteran of 26 years, Frank comes to this conclusion: “The problem is we don’t have the votes” to give ENDA job coverage to transgenders.
But the fact that the House is even considering this idea shows how much has changed in the last few decades.
With the 2008 elections in sight, the transgender issue could give House Democrats in conservative-leaning districts something to vote against even as they vote for ENDA for gays and lesbians.
The view from Dover, Ohio
One Democratic freshman in a Republican-leaning district, Rep. Zack Space of Ohio, said he supports the idea of banning workplace discrimination against gays and lesbians.
But legal protections for transgender people, he said, is a “more foreign” idea, and he is “not comfortable making a commitment on that.”
But even without transgender people included in it, would ENDA be politically unpalatable in Space’s Ohio district? “It may be, or it may not be,” Space said. “My vote on that issue is not based on the fallout politically.”
President Bush carried Space’s district in 2004 with 57 percent of the vote.
Also in 2004, Ohio voters overwhelmingly passed a ballot initiative amending the state constitution to make “only a union between one man and one woman” legally valid.
But marriage, Space said “is an entirely different matter” than employment policies.
ENDA “is not an insuperable problem for most of the Democratic freshman,” said Frank. “Several (Democratic) freshmen told me they’d vote for it.”
- Discuss StoryOn Newsvine
- Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM POLITICS |
| Add Politics headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links




